Supreme Court to Rule on FCCs Fines for Casual Swearing..November 4th
Caronte22 — Wed, 10/08/2008 - 00:53
This is America, the land of the free, where we can say and do what
we please without some government overlord pushing us around about it.
And there's a landmark case coming up before the Supreme Court on
November 4th, election day, dealing with just this: the right to
accidentally drop the F-bomb on live TV and not get in trouble for it.
What would our founding fathers do?
The case revolves around "fleeting expletives," which are swears
said offhand that aren't planned for or repeated. It used to be the
case that such instances weren't fined by the FCC, but in 2006 the FCC
fined Fox for true American heroes Cher and Nicole Richie swearing
during the Billboard music Awards.
So Fox has been battling the fining in court ever since, and it's
now finally reaching the supreme court. Most first amendment scholars
are on Fox's side on this one, and I'd have to agree with them. If
drunk, coked up celebs can't swear accidentally on live TV and not face
any consequences, is this really the land of the free? Maybe TV
stations would get fined for stuff like this in North Korea, but not
here. Hopefully the Supreme Court will end up on the side of justice,
freedom and casual swearing. [Ars Technica]



I don't know if any of you
Wolfie — Wed, 10/08/2008 - 19:47I don't know if any of you remember being 5-10 years old, but when my friends and I were out of earshot of any adults, we arbitrarily blurted out every cuss word we could think of be they in context or of any sensical nature or not. It was just fun because it was something we weren't supposed to do. If you, as an adult, think that you can shield your children from things of this nature, be prepared to homeschool.
I may be a bit different from most people. I grew up in a hostile, redneck invironment in which cusswords were used often and at a high decibel level. My mother and stepfather were almost constantly fighting. Foul language is so ingrained into my redneck speech that most times, I don't even realize I'm using bad words unless someone points them out to me. The times I use swear words on purpose, I use them to show emphasis and passion. I feel cusswords are important to the english language (especially in writing) for this reason.
As far as the FCC is concerned, I believe it makes sense to fine foul language and behavior on shows where those things are not expected or rated for. I do think it's rediculous how much things are edited on T.V. though. I think that as long as the show is rated at a more mature level, there should be no censorship. I mean... thats what that damn V-chip is for right?
Lastly, and least relevant, the US government is not democratic. It is a Representative Republic. In a democracy, everyone votes for everything. In America we are too retarded and volumous to vote for everything so we vote for people to represent our values/oppinions/beliefs. This system worked wonders when the country is founded, but more recently we are far too concerned with our iPods, which celebrity went on an alchohol/drug bender and drove their car into an old ladies pool, saving trees/the spotted owl/ozone layer, and otherwise telling other people how to lead their lives to give an educated thought towards our country or those who lead it other than eating spoonfed bullshit from "objective" news segments and accepting it as truth. Instead, our polititians represent the interests of the bracket of citizens who can throw money at men in suits to get their way.
__________________________________
<The Original BeastMastery Hunter>
And I also want to add how
jaibyrd — Wed, 10/08/2008 - 17:05And I also want to add how much fun this is to debate something with you ;-)
Yes, I like to heal. No, I've never been shadow.
Don't get me wrong shihli
jaibyrd — Wed, 10/08/2008 - 17:01Don't get me wrong shihli I'm not a prude, never have been, and I DEFINATELY support free speech. However, I'm more concerned here in this spur of the moment casual debate with whether inappropriate behavior on publicly broadcast television should or should not be legislated to be fined by the FCC. Remember I don't actually have a say in any of this because I'm not from your country. Also, for the particular situation I do not believe either Cher or Nicole Richie were inappropriate if it were not broadcast to the general population and if they were not already 'icons' of the entertainment sector. Had it been swearing at a closed event, understandable and probably encouraged, but because they are both well known entainers and were speaking publicly to an audience of various ages and social beliefs, I do think they have the right to free speech but certainly have a responsibility to behave appropriately. To put it bluntly I don't give a shit if they fuckin swear. I do however, believe that we as a whole population need to decide if that is how we all shall behave? And that is the crux of my arguement here: Do we decide that free speech (with its inherant mindblowing abilities for misuse) comes with consequences or without. I believe in free speech, and yes Cher and Nicole can say whatever they wish whenever they wish...but with freedom, as I said earlier, comes responsibility. If free speech becomes more important than the responsibility for that freedom it will unbalance the freedom it supposedly creates. Noting in life is totally free, it never has been. There are always boundaries for behavior and consequences therein. The FCC is simply inforcing the boundaries, it is not curtailing free speech.
Yes, I like to heal. No, I've never been shadow.
All I'm saying is there's
Shihli — Wed, 10/08/2008 - 16:36All I'm saying is there's FAR worse things that "role models" do on TV than say fuck accidentally. The TV shows "House" and "Dexter" both have main characters that are exemplary in how one SHOULDN'T behave.
Then there's Paris Hilton, Nicole Richie, and the whole slew of celebrities living lifestyles that don't set a good example.
If anything, forcing a sheltered lifestyle leads to kids growing up seeking out the things they don't understand, often in a series of bad choices. I'm not saying they NEED to be introduced to things like foul language and the like, but honestly kids will find a way to learn about them - be it via discussing it with their parents, or by raw experimentation.
I'll admit that when I was growing up (high school) I had a patch where I did a lot of questionable crap - smoked a little weed, drank a lot of alcohol, tried cigarettes, and tried being in a serious relationship - all when I was 16. Through the process, I learned:
a) (NOTE: MY VIEWPOINT!) Weed doesn't give much more of a high than simply having a good meal and a fun time with friends.
b) learned my alcohol limit and tolerance (via alcohol poisoning).
c) Cigarettes are stupid.
d) So are teenagers, particularly ones that say "I love you". Guilty here too.
While I wouldn't advocate my route of "discovery" of these things, I didn't turn out any worse for the wear because of it.
Nature vs. nurture etc etc etc.
Well since in your country
jaibyrd — Wed, 10/08/2008 - 16:29Well since in your country and mine we are part of democratic societies (though mine is more socialistic than yours) we all decide what is appropriate. I personally don't want to see more slovenly decrepit representitives of the human race becoming the poster children for 'normal' behavior of the society that I live in.
Yes, I like to heal. No, I've never been shadow.
That raises the question -
Shihli — Wed, 10/08/2008 - 16:16That raises the question - who determines "appropriate" behavior?
The fines may be against "inappropriate language" but it directly jumps headfirst into free speech territory.
I've never been a druid
jaibyrd — Wed, 10/08/2008 - 15:59I've never been a druid other than Moonbyrd. And I guess my point is this: With freedom comes responsibility to behave appropriately. Are the fines against free speech or against inappropriate behavior? As I'm sure I've said before 'monkey see monkey do'.
Yes, I like to heal. No, I've never been shadow.
To paraphrase star trek,
Adwarflol — Wed, 10/08/2008 - 12:15To paraphrase star trek, words are only offensive because people are
afraid of them... or something along that line. I'm not trying to sound
pretentious but I think that they had a pretty good premise going there
<_<
-----------------------------
I was like :3 but then I srs'd
Might I add - I grew up
Shihli — Wed, 10/08/2008 - 11:58Might I add -
I grew up being a proper potty-mouth, searing like any teenager would.
I never swore at my teachers, never swore at my parents, and never swore at my friends in anything outside of the typical teenage sillyness.
I never swore at my elders or people in power - hell, I know plenty of people older than myself that swear more than I do.
Swearing goes on in every language on every continent everywhere in the world. Hell, "swearing" only exists because a select few group of people in power say "These are bad words!"
Fuck wouldn't be a swear word if we weren't told that it was.
Children will swear
Shihli — Wed, 10/08/2008 - 11:55Children will swear regardless of whether or not crack addictss like Nicole Ritchie do.
Any limitation on FREE SPEECH is a violation of our rights. Being fined is ... well, it's alright I guess as it's not a direct limitation. Just be ready to pay out if you say fuck on TV.
Keep in mind that a lot of "safe" words and phrases we use are NOT actually very kind or "safe" to people of other faiths and paths. "Holy cow" is a blaspheme on the Hindu belief in the sacredness of cows. Saying something is a gyp (a rip-off, "I got gypped!") is a racial slur towards gypsies. And saying things like "frak", "dang", "crap" and the like are mere euphamisms to the words they are used to replace.
Swearing happens, it's whether or not it's directed towards someone else ("fuck you") or just an indirect blurt ("fucking hell, this sucks") is how I find it offensive.
And if you think the USA has it bad when it comes to swearing - go to Britain.
I say they fine nicole
Dikymo — Wed, 10/08/2008 - 11:48I say they fine nicole richie for being a scabby coke whore. at least thats illegal. If these two can get away with it, I want Norm back on SNL weekend update.
Jai, you didnt used to be a druid named Keshini by chance?
Dikymo: Attacking ignorance and stupidity with ignorance AND stupidity since 1812.
I'm actually ok with the not
jaibyrd — Wed, 10/08/2008 - 11:03I'm actually ok with the not allowed/fine for swearing on television. I've always taught my lads that swearing is optional language for those of us who do not have a command of English. I think trying to teach good manners (even by the evils of media) is not a bad idea, never was. There is a wide audience for television, not just 16-50 year olds and perhaps thinking about the bigger picture here is a good plan. How will having acceptable casual swearing affect our daily lives? Will the swearing we hear on television affect our children, or elders, or persons of power? Will children swear at their teachers in grade school? What about at their grandparents or religious leaders? I'm not fond of the idea that very young children are going to hear a whole hell of a lot more swearing if the fines are taken away then they are hearing now. And frankly: for pity sake can we not, as a population, decide that the English language has more to offer then seven banned words? I've heard some fairly creative mud slinging that doesn't involve swearing on television and enjoyed it much more than I should've.
However I'm pretty sure this is a grab for 'random tax collecting' and will only make a difference for the amount of money the fcc gets from the providers of the shows.
Yes, I like to heal. No, I've never been shadow.
Hopefully they'll loosen up.
Agoney — Wed, 10/08/2008 - 06:46Hopefully they'll loosen up. I wouldnt want to hear someone repeatedly swear over and over again, but totally hate government sponsored censorship.
Haha. This is just a few
Kognus — Wed, 10/08/2008 - 04:20Haha. This is just a few steps short of the anti-swearing laws in Demolition Man with Sly. Incredible.
See the Seven Words you
Dragonspear — Wed, 10/08/2008 - 04:12See the Seven Words you Can't Say on Television by George Carlin. The only new thing is the fines, not being able to say them period has been around for awhile.
IMO this is less about the fines than it is about the language itself for FOX, Cher and Nicole Richie. Anyway, this is one of the few times I will agree with FOXNoise and say they are in the right here.
"--Many class changes. You won't like the ones made
to your own class but you'll think the changes made to the 9 other
classes are all overpowered." ~Tigole, Blizzard CM